Gosh I hate the load test....Were my assumptions correct, will I have wasted effort and money and time?
Test of the aft fuselage and boom, attached by spar wing attach fittings:
The setup weighted something and to bring up the chains and come-along level I might add 20# to the 212# number which will give the 232# target for 12# ft sq tail gust load.
Really another screw-up, I though from memory the number was 209# but I can fudge as the line above shows.
There was distortion of the wing attach fittings, but probably a fair distance from catastrophic failure,....The distortion was not past the proportional limit and as the last picture shows the fittings came back and there was no permanent distortion.
I will take it as a pass even though I had not expected the distortion of the attach angles, and probably the unit would not have survived the calculated 27 # ft sq which was the stress sizing. That part was difficult to estimate as to how it should be figured given the assembly it is attached to.
There is some question as to how valid this is because of the substantial fixture attached to the aircraft structure, but I am not sure there is any other way at this point in construction.